The Take
King of Con! is not worth watching. It positions itself as an exposé on The King of Kong but delivers a bitter, one-sided rant that exposes more about its director's personal grievances than any widespread documentary fraud.
Dwayne Richard, a Donkey Kong player left out of the 2007 film, claims secret payoffs and altered facts, yet the result feels like extended forum drama rather than fresh journalism.
The Verdict
The film tries to pull back the curtain on documentary manipulation but mostly reveals its own tunnel vision. Mixed reception and ongoing debates about its claims make it feel dated and incomplete.
Skip it.
Common Questions
Why is King of Con! controversial?
Mostly No. Its editing claims stay debated without decisive new proof beyond personal accounts.
Is King of Con! based on a true story?
Yes, but it selectively highlights disputes involving its director Dwayne Richard.
Does King of Con! ruin The King of Kong?
No. The 2007 doc still stands as the better arcade rivalry story for most viewers.
